<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BreachBytes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.breachbytes.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.breachbytes.com</link>
	<description>Network Forensics &#124; Network Monitoring &#124; Incident Response</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 20:11:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Data Breach Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.breachbytes.com/2010/08/10/federal-data-breach-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.breachbytes.com/2010/08/10/federal-data-breach-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 20:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Uphoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaches]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breachbytes.com/?p=59</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kenneth Corbin has been doing an excellent job covering legislation in US Senate regarding data breaches. A new bill has been introduced however two similar bills have already fizzled in the Senate. He notes that 46 states have some form of data breach protection but I see this really as a federal issue as tax [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.esecurityplanet.com/author.php/74813/Kenneth-Corbin.htm">Kenneth Corbin</a> has been doing an excellent job covering <a href="http://www.esecurityplanet.com/features/article.php/3897501/Senate-Dems-Push-Data-Breach-Bill.htm">legislation in US Senate regarding data breaches</a>. A new bill has been introduced however two similar bills have already fizzled in the Senate. He notes that 46 states have some form of data breach protection but I see this really as a federal issue as tax payers need uniform protection from data breaches. </p>
<p>For more information check out <a href="http://www.esecurityplanet.com/features/article.php/3897501/Senate-Dems-Push-Data-Breach-Bill.htm">his latest article</a> and the related stories linked there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.breachbytes.com/2010/08/10/federal-data-breach-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Open Source Product Review: OSSEC, Part 1: Setup</title>
		<link>http://www.breachbytes.com/2010/08/09/open-source-product-review-ossec-part-1-setup/</link>
		<comments>http://www.breachbytes.com/2010/08/09/open-source-product-review-ossec-part-1-setup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 13:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Uphoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Network Forensics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[incident response]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSSEC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breachbytes.com/?p=49</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The OSSEC project is one that I have been familiar with for a while but have never had the time or energy to properly evaluate for myself. I even made its installation an option for a lab in a network security tools course I taught but I never had the time to sit down and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a title="OSSEC Homepage" href="http://www.ossec.net/">OSSEC</a> project is one that I have been familiar with for a while but have never had the time or energy to properly evaluate for myself. I even made its installation an option for a lab in a<a href="https://docs.google.com/View?id=dscbbtp_349hhc86ff3"> network security tools course I taught</a> but I never had the time to sit down and look carefully at the system.</p>
<p>I started my installation with a Ubuntu 10.4 server that was hosting a Subversion repository and little else. My first step was clicking my way through several links to finally get to the installation instructions I needed. Don&#8217;t bother with the Getting Started page; it won&#8217;t get you started. Its more of a feature list and overview. The First Steps page is a better place to go. Scroll down to Install It and click on Installation guides page. Finally some instructions!</p>
<p>These are adequate instructions but do not mention that if your system doesn&#8217;t have gcc and make it won&#8217;t work as the system must be built from source. I found <a href="http://acidborg.wordpress.com/2009/10/08/how-to-install-and-configure-ossec-in-ubuntu-server-9-04/">this tutorial for installing OSSEC on Ubuntu 9</a> and had no further problems completing the install. The OSSEC installation materials could be improved by incorporating some of the additional information found that tutorial.</p>
<p>In most cases OSSEC is deployed on multiple servers within an organization. The system, a Host-based Intrusion Detection System (HIDS), monitors only a single host. In my case I only had one host to monitor so this part of my setup was complete. In a real network setting the system administrators would have to install the software on every server. This is non-trivial for very large networks with diverse server types &#8211; many of which will not have the build tools installed to compile the software.</p>
<p>Once I got my new HIDS installed it was time to start the service. A simple shell command starts the HIDS: &#8216;/var/ossec/bin/ossec-control start&#8217;. That was it! Pretty soon after starting the service I started getting email alerts of people trying to log into the machine via ssh connections from obvious account names like root, testing and admin. Here&#8217;s an example:</p>
<pre>
OSSEC HIDS Notification.
2010 Aug 09 17:13:16

Received From: localhost->/var/log/auth.log
Rule: 5712 fired (level 10) -> "SSHD brute force trying to get access to the system."
Portion of the log(s):

Aug  9 17:13:15 localhost sshd[29833]: Invalid user webadmin from x.x.x.x
Aug  9 17:13:13 localhost sshd[29831]: Invalid user tomcat from x.x.x.x
Aug  9 17:13:11 localhost sshd[29829]: Invalid user samba from x.x.x.x
Aug  9 17:13:09 localhost sshd[29827]: Invalid user office from x.x.x.x
Aug  9 17:13:08 localhost sshd[29825]: Invalid user alias from x.x.x.x
Aug  9 17:13:06 localhost sshd[29822]: Invalid user recruit from x.x.x.x
Aug  9 17:13:04 localhost sshd[29820]: Invalid user sales from x.x.x.x
</pre>
<p></p>
<h3>Next steps</h3>
<p>In future posts I will go into installing the web interface and the usability and effectiveness of OSSEC. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.breachbytes.com/2010/08/09/open-source-product-review-ossec-part-1-setup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Heartland Breach Fallout, 18+ months later</title>
		<link>http://www.breachbytes.com/2010/08/04/heartland-breach-fallout-18-months-later/</link>
		<comments>http://www.breachbytes.com/2010/08/04/heartland-breach-fallout-18-months-later/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 21:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Uphoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links to articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breachbytes.com/?p=48</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We reported on the Heartland Payment Systems data breach back in January 2009 when it was first breaking. The company is just now coming back to profitability after 18+ months trying to recover from a data breach (investigation costs, litigation, settlements, etc) with the backdrop of the terrible economy. Take a look at the 5YR [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We reported on the <a title="Heartland Homepage" href="http://www.heartlandpaymentsystems.com/" target="_blank">Heartland Payment Systems</a> <a title="Heartland breach coverage on BreachBytes" href="http://www.breachbytes.com/2009/01/21/heartland-payment-systems-breach-coverage/" target="_blank">data breach back in January 2009</a> when it was first breaking. The company is <a href="http://quicktake.morningstar.com/Stocknet/san.aspx?id=347050">just now coming back to profitability</a> after 18+ months trying to recover from a data breach (investigation costs, litigation, settlements, etc) with the backdrop of the terrible economy. Take a look at the 5YR stock price here on <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=hpy">Google Finance</a>. You can clearly see that the company bottoms out right after the breach and then has been slowly climbing back ever since.</p>
<p>It seems there are two things that can be taken away from this breach:</p>
<ol>
<li>The costs of recovering from a serious data breach are very high and can drag down an otherwise successful business for very long periods of time</li>
<li>A smart company can and will recover from a serious event like a data breach over time</li>
</ol>
<p>Of course I do not have behind-the-scenes information to offer opinions on these points in this particular case however my personal belief is that smart IT spending on security solutions is worth the money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.breachbytes.com/2010/08/04/heartland-breach-fallout-18-months-later/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BreachBytes? Anybody there?</title>
		<link>http://www.breachbytes.com/2010/08/04/breach-bytes-hiatus-over/</link>
		<comments>http://www.breachbytes.com/2010/08/04/breach-bytes-hiatus-over/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 21:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Uphoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breachbytes.com/?p=47</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A note to readers of this blog: BreachBytes has been on extended hiatus for the last year plus as I have been focusing on family and settling into my still-new career as a professor teaching Computer Science and Software Engineering at the Milwaukee School of Engineering. Thanks to all that have posted comments in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A note to readers of this blog: </strong></p>
<p>BreachBytes has been on extended hiatus for the last year plus as I have been focusing on family and settling into my still-new career as a professor teaching Computer Science and Software Engineering at the Milwaukee School of Engineering. Thanks to all that have posted comments in the meantime. I will try to do a better job posting new material and replying to comments as things have settled down a bit.</p>
<p>Thanks again for your interest.</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>Ben Uphoff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.breachbytes.com/2010/08/04/breach-bytes-hiatus-over/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brazen Hacker Ransoms Patient Data</title>
		<link>http://www.breachbytes.com/2009/05/05/brazen-hacker-ransoms-patient-data/</link>
		<comments>http://www.breachbytes.com/2009/05/05/brazen-hacker-ransoms-patient-data/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 15:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Uphoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links to articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breachbytes.com/?p=46</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you are a Virginia resident there is a chance your medical records are being held hostage by a hacker that breached the Virginia Prescription Monitoring Program. He is demanding $10 million dollars to return the records he deleted when he breached their network. The original report of the breach from Wikileaks can be found here. Excellent coverage [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are a Virginia resident there is a chance your medical records are being held hostage by a hacker that breached the Virginia Prescription Monitoring Program. He is demanding $10 million dollars to return the records he deleted when he breached their network. The original report of the breach from Wikileaks can be found <a href="http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Over_8M_Virginian_patient_records_held_to_ransom,_30_Apr_2009">here</a>. Excellent coverage can be found in this <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2009/05/hackers_break_into_virginia_he.html">Washington Post blog</a> as well. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.breachbytes.com/2009/05/05/brazen-hacker-ransoms-patient-data/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
